I've often heard people, sometimes laying claim to the mantle of authority with a white erase-board and a clever acronym, tell me that "college isn't about preparing yourself for a career, it's about readying yourself intellectually for the rest of your life." Well, I guess I must have bought it, because I'm going to a liberal arts college, but it occurred to me that I know next to nothing about the philosophy surrounding that piece of paper we call a liberal arts degree. So, I did some research.
The simplest definition of a liberal arts education is an education which largely or completely forgoes vocational instruction in favor of teaching the liberal arts subjects of the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities. Science, Math, English, and so on, basically the core subjects of our own high school.
Why are these subjects useful? Lawyers, doctors, businesspeople (members of the Big Three of American career tracks) aren't going to be using their knowledge of chemistry, calculus, or Chaucer in their jobs, so why even bother? The quick response from the liberals arts educators is: a liberal arts education teaches you how to analyze complex information, derive a conclusion from that information, and build an argument persuasively supporting that conclusion. Those are skills which are integral to success in many walks of life, but especially in careers like law, medicine, and business.
Liberal arts educators also point out that analyzing information, forming conclusions, and building arguments are necessary skills for an active and informed member of a democratic nation. The democracies of the world are experiencing turmoil and strain, they argue, because the majority of their populations do not have the benefit of a liberal arts education. Perhaps this claim, and the claim in the previous paragraph, strike you as condescending or overreaching. I felt similarly, so let's touch upon some criticisms.
Critics of liberal arts argue that it might be good at teaching critical thinking in isolated subjects (analyzing literature, solving calculus problems) but too often it doesn't teach students on how to bring diverse subject matter together and synthesize it, perhaps because professors have spent their whole lives becoming experts on a specific subject. To their credit, however, liberal arts colleges have begun adding "cross-disciplinary majors" whose aim is to promote just that. (How effective they are, I have no idea.)
Another criticism is that, with the rapid increase in new technology and new ideas, liberal arts education is being outpaced. The outside world doesn't have the luxury of waiting a half-century before definitively deciding if an idea is worth applying, but liberal arts colleges are hesitant about discussing ideas with a few decades of discussion behind them.
So all of the above is something that I (and hopefully you) will think about as college slowly approaches. I'm not sure how valuable a liberal arts education really is, but I don't feel ready to commit myself to a vocation just yet, (and we've already sent in a deposit), so I'll be finding out first-hand come August.
Recent Comments